We Need a Substitute
For substitutionary atonement theory. Actually, let's get rid of the word theory first. Because the use of the term atonement theory by theologians is extraordinarily misleading. A theory is a description of the rules governing interactions in nature. One result of a theory, if it is a theory at all, is that it makes predictions about how objects and people will behave in certain circumstances. So, for example, Isaac Newton's theory of gravity specified the way that objects having the property of mass would interact with each other (they would each exert an attractive force proportional to their mass.) It was readily testable by observing objects from apples to planets and seeing how they were attracted to one another. And it was thus enormously successful. Theories of the atonement appear like theories in that they describe the rules governing God's relationship with humans. They glean these rules from interpretations of scripture related to both the character of God ...